« new paper: The Emerging Neo-communitarianism | Main | the pre-history of the Tweet »

June 01, 2012



What exactly does:

"Money has always been a central problem for neoliberalism, which neoliberals have sought to deal with through limiting its supply (monetarism)"

Mean. Because it reads like gibberish.

Will Davies

That monetarism sought to target a particular level of money supply, in order to reduce inflation. Am I wrong?


eh. more a particular rate of chance of the money supply, which has now been expanded into targeting a particular expectation of a particular rate of change...

It's just a really strange and narrow way of looking at monetarism. It's sorta like saying that Einstein's Theory of General Relativity was always a core problem to Mid-Century Anthropologists. I mean, maybe they're related, but neither is really core to the other.

I just don't see how money is a central problem for neoliberalism, insofar as the medium of exchange and account has been around for way longer than that.

It isn't like there is a cohent Liberal philosophy of money that stands in opposition to the idea that the money supply is really important for determining aggregate economic activity.

The comments to this entry are closed.